IMPORTANCE OF PAYMENT RESPONSE

The recent High Court decision in Sito Construction Pte Ltd (trading as Afone International) v PBT Engineering Pte Ltd [2019] SGHC 7 (“Sito v Afone”) is yet another reminder of the importance of raising jurisdictional objection as early as possible for respondents under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act (“SOP Act”).

Read More
Crystl Hsu
INJUNCTIVE RELIEF FOR BREACH OF ARBITRATION AGREEMENT

In the recent Court of Appeal decision of Sun Travels & Tours Pvt Ltd v Hilton International Manage (Maldives) Pvt Ltd [2019] SGCA 10 (“Sun v Hilton”), the Court of Appeal dealt with, inter alia, when would anti-suit injunctions and anti-enforcement injunctions be granted when foreign proceedings were commenced in breach of an arbitration agreement.

Read More
Crystl Hsu
A TALE OF TWO SOP ADS

In the recent High Court decision of United Integrated Services Pte Ltd v Civil Tech Pte Ltd and another [2019] SGHC 32 (“UIS v CTPL”), the High Court dealt with the question of, inter alia, what happens if an Adjudication Determination (“AD”) issued under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act (“SOP Act”) has been effectively superseded by a subsequent AD: should enforcement of the prior AD be allowed independent of the second AD?

Read More
Crystl Hsu
BREACHES OF NATURAL JUSTICE IN SOP ADJUDICATION

In the recent Court of Appeal decision of Glaziers Engineering Pte Ltd v WCS Engineering Construction Pte Ltd [2018] 2 SLR 1311, the Court of Appeal made clear that the threshold to set aside an adjudication determination rendered under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act (“SOP Act”) is a high one.

Read More
Crystl Hsu
WHEN TO GARNISH A BANK ACCOUNT

In the recent Court of Appeal decision in SCK Serijadi Sdn Bhd v Artison Interior Pte Ltd (“SCK Serijadi”), the Court of Appeal made clear that the service of a garnishee order nisi does not turn a judgment creditor into a secured creditor.  

Read More
Crystl Hsu
WHETHER A COMPANY IN LIQUIDATION CAN COMMENCE ADJUDICATION

In Michael J Lonsdale (Electrical) Ltd v Bresco Electrical Services Ltd [2018] EWHC 2043 (TCC) (“Lonsdale”), The Honourable Mr. Justice Fraser decided that a company in liquidation cannot refer a dispute to adjudication under the Housing Grants Construction and Regeneration Act when that dispute includes (whether in whole or in part) determination of any claim for further sums said to be due to that company from the responding party.  

Read More
Crystl Hsu
PAY NOW, ARGUE LATER VS. TRUE VALUE

In S&T (UK) Ltd v Grove Developments Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 2448 (“S&T”), the English Court of Appeal dealt with (albeit obiter) the issue of whether an employer is entitled to pursue a claim in adjudication to determine the correct value of works on the date of an interim application. The English Court of Appeal expressly highlighted that it was dealing with this issue in light of its importance to the profession and the industry, given that there were conflicting English High Court decisions on this point ([3] S&T).  

Read More
Crystl Hsu
Sue And Forfeit Arbitration

The Court of Appeal recently dealt with the issue of whether the commencement of court proceedings in respect of a dispute covered by an arbitration agreement can constitute a repudiatory breach of the arbitration agreement, and what would amount to an acceptance of such repudiation, in the decision of Marty Ltd v Hualon Corp (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd [2018] SGCA 63. 

Read More
Crystl Hsu
Singapore Infrastructure Dispute-Management Protocol

On 23 October 2018, the Ministry of Law launched a new Singapore Infrastructure Dispute-Management Protocol (“SIDP”).

A copy of the protocol is available for download via the Singapore Mediation Centre’s website, which is one of the two Authorised Appointing Bodies under the Protocol.

Read More
Crystl Hsu